Google Tramples in Another Field

October 28th, 2009

The ever growing Googlemonster’s feet have started stomping in new places.  First it was web analytics – offering the free Google Analytics service.  Google purchased one of the online leaders in that field, Urchin, to make that happen.  Then it was YouTube.  Then Google Pages – free web page hosting.  And Google Docs. And Google Voice.  And now Google is making the Wave.  There are 20 or 30 other industries Google’s getting into, also.

Most people will be glad to have turn-by-turn directions on their GPS cellphones for free.  I know I will use it when I get a smartphone.  But I get a sinking feeling in my stomach when I think about it.

Recently a New York Times article published a bit about the new service:

But during a briefing with reporters on Tuesday, Eric E. Schmidt, Google’s chief executive, said he didn’t think of the new service as disrupting an industry. Instead, he said it is a windfall for consumers that was made possible by the increasing power of smartphones and the growing ubiquity of Internet access.

“Obviously we like the price of free because consumers like that as well,” he said.

After the briefing, Mr. Schmidt said he was not concerned that the new service would create new enemies for Google. “As long as you are on the side of consumers, you’ll be fine,” he said.

On the side of consumers.

That sounds so nice!  Who pays for all this stuff?  Consumers don’t?   Right.  At least not directly, and here’s the rub.

The people that consume the services are not the same people that directly pay for it.  That’s a problem!

Google makes the vast bulk of its googley profits by this little product called Google Adwords.  Advertising built into their online search – that right-hanging list of sponsored links.  The problem is that businesses who want to get a start online have no choice but to participate in that.  It’s the defacto standard.

Clicking once on any of those right links can add 50 cents, to upwards of several dollars to Google’s coffer.

And how are those ads placed? What determines which ads appear highest?  Well, Google optimizes the placement by which ones generate them the most money.  Clicks times Click-cost divided by impressions.  It’s a simple formula.

What it means for a small business owner, though, is sheer hell.  Or heaven.  But in the end, a business can expect to give away 40 to 60% of its gross revenue….

Google can eat more than half of a company’s gross revenue….

Not to making good products. Not to employees. Not to good materials! Not to production capacity…. but to Google.

Why?  Well if you and I are competing to sell mattresses, then if we want to get our site out there to people searching for mattresses, we compete against each other to see whose ad wins with optimal placement in Google Adsense.  We fight against each other to see which of us will give more profit to Google.  And the thing is, if I spend less than you do, I may get bumped off that precious first page entirely, and my sales will plummet.  Cause for an online business, particularly a new one, almost all the sales come from Google referrals.

So Google ends up with the win here. Not me, not you.  Except we get free GPS navigation on our phones! woohoo!

Google’s problem is this:

The customer that consumes their web search (the person who does google searches) is totally disconnected from the cost of placing the ad.  And the ad pricing model is built to extract the most money possible out of the business.

There’s a disconnect between the consumers of the service (the search customers), and the price of the service (as offered by the company posting the ad), and Google gets the difference.

If customers would wisen up, and just stop clicking on those ads, then Google’s money supply would go dry.  In the end, it’s the consumers that lose.  Google is cheating you by offering you all of this free stuff, and at the same time, taking the money out of your back pocket in the form of added cost of doing business that you pay to the people you buy stuff from.

Google Docs vs. Office? No contest

October 27th, 2009

I keep reading stories of how Google Docs is making inroads against Microsoft Office in the news here and there, and I just don’t see it happening.

Google Docs is great!  I use it every day!  It, and its other online editing counterparts, have a long way to go though to be an editor replacement for a real word processor.  Here are a few GLARING problems with it:

  • You can’t see pagination when editing.  How are you supposed to tell what a printed page will look like while you’re working on your document?  I don’t see how an online app is gonna do this at all.
  • You can’t define paragraph styles. That’s kind of, you know, basic.
  • There’s no template support. Again HELLO!
  • Zoho Writer has an equation editor, GoogleDocs doesn’t – but it’s rather important to be able to edit the equations you have if you do that sort of thing.
  • Insertion of media and / or other elements like spreadsheets and graphs is lacking.  GoogleDocs image support STINKS.  You have very little placement control, you can’t control borders, or spacing around images.
  • Document sections?  HAH.  Address the other issues first!

So in short, so far Zohowriter and GoogleDocs both just don’t measure up to providing even basic printed document editing.  It’s great for collaborative working.  But when it comes time to print, well, it’s time to copy out of Google Docs and paste into Word. Or Pages – I actually like that Mac program.

I really like Zoho in some ways because it has a nicer toolbar, but in general I prefer GoogleDocs.

I do think that OpenOffice is a much more viable alternative for Linux users, but using Linux for normal people still has its own issues.

It seems to me that the people that write these stories haven’t really done their homework in actually thinking about why people use word processors (you know:  Usually to PRINT) or why they want to edit documents collaboratively online (you know:  usually to share information online).  The two ways of communicating are very different.

Extemporaneous

October 22nd, 2009

Out of the singularity

All energy, matter congealed.  Life.

Integral to the Christian faith of many is the separation between CreatOR and CreatED.  That God spoke, and the universe became.

Lately in the halls of Physics the brightest of the feeble human minds have tried to conceive of the unified theory of everything.   It’s a desire to bring together two different physical worlds:  the tiny and the huge.  Theory of Quantum Mechanics governs the tiny. Einstein’s Theory of General Relativity the huge.  But bringing the two together has been a problem, though it has spurned a great deal of creative mathematics far beyond my ability to perceive!

One artifact of all attempts to unify the theories, though, is profound:  Time cancels out of the equation.  Equations that don’t have time in them are not useful for doing things in a universe governed by time.  Instead, the theory reduces to truisms.  Theoretical truisms that are nonetheless profound.

E= m c ^ 2

That great truism that heralds our own self destruction or liberation to utopia stands at the heart of many issues in today’s world.  In the end, it equates matter and energy.  Stuff.  The same stuff, different forms.  Back at the earliest reaches of our universe, the distant past, the very first femtoseconds, all of the universe was energy.  Quark soup, teeming with heat that random perturbation disturbed.  Out of that soup came the neutrons and protons and atoms and molecules and fusion and elements and galaxies with stars and plantes and life and me.

God is Will.  The Word of God is the Will of God born on Spirit.  Energy.

The thing is, before quark soup when the universe was an apple sized orb, there was no time. Time itself congealed.

Time is a perceptual artifact of causality.

Perceptual. Artifact.  It seems to exist because the mixed state of atoms in my brain do not have in them the capability to perceive the future well.   Perceive the future well.  But to perceive the future…. at all???? Does that not point to a symmetry between future and past from this present moment?

To separate God from Creation is to have a God outside – impotent – without Energy. And to allow God in, to allow a divine working presence in the universe, to grant energy, necessarily grants matter.  For how can there be anything outside of what is except to be what is not?  And if God exists, then God is not outside what is. Or God is not.

Christians often propose the problem with a creator-creation tie:  If God is creation, who made?  In Physics, that’s like asking what is before the big bang.  There is no “before”.  Because time itself is part of it.  Just because it is not in our feeble mind’s capability to understand that creator and created can be one and the same and still have created be creator, that doesn’t make it not so.  The absence of a conceivable alternative does not predicate the truth of a limited, easy-to-understand one.

God forbid that me, oh tiny little bit of creation that I am, could begin to conceive of an infinite universe far…. far far… far bigger than this puny brain!

When Newt Gingrich spoke here at Montreat College this past weekend, something bothered me deeply.  Deeply disturbing.  It was peppered through the crowd.  It was the knowing nod.  You’ve seen it.  It’s the “we’ve got it right!” nod.  The Evangelical SUV-American GEEZUS grin.  Pastic and prideful and imperialist.  I do wish, that we in general as humans, were at least smart enough to realize that our brains are very very very very very very PUNY!  And that if there is one truth that stands above others, that is more than anything for sure, it’s this:

We don’t know, and we will never know, what the hell we are talking about when it comes to GOD.

Moving through October

October 20th, 2009

So far this year I’ve made a bit of progress on personal goals for 2009.  I noticed last year that I wasn’t really happy with my own ability to do things that I set out to do!  So this year, in January, I wrote them down.

Doing a yearly life assessment seems like a good idea to me – to take the new year to reflect on what has happened to me in my life and what it means to me, and how I’d like to see my remaining time, and gifts, unfold.

This coming year I will do this at the Winter Sostice, because that’s a more spiritually connected time – the actual start of the astronomical new year.  There’s something special about these days as turning points.  They have a feel to them that’s unique. Ephemeral.  The longest night of the year feels cozy, withdrawn, introspective.  What a great time to think about how the new year might bloom and grow and evolve into something beautiful.

So what were my goals for 2009?

  • Find a new, better place to live.  DONE!  I love my new house! Come see me at Treehouse if you haven’t.
  • Explore a return to full time teaching.  DONE!  I’m enrolled in WCU and it will take longer than I thought.  My attempts to find a private school job failed this year, though I did have two interviews.
  • Simplify.  Step away from M5 a bit, and help pass things off to Owen.  In progress – I think since my move to working full-time at Montreat, I’m not really happy with how things have gone, but I’m optimistic about our new arrangement.  I love Owen dearly! I want things to be successful. (Yes, Owen, you can read that!).
  • Personal Development -  Piano – Reading – dating a bit.   That’s been okay.I’m not entirely happy with my progress in these areas.- Dating.  I’ve been on a few dates, and had some fun, but I am really not feeling very connected with others.  Or connected with myself either. Maybe that’s an issue.    My online relationship is stable and enjoyable most of the time!

    - Piano’s coming okay though – but I would like to play with music more.

    - Wordpress Blogging – hahaha well….. here it is. ;)

    - Writing – haven’t done much aside from my blog. Though I did start work on an Alice and Java text that I plan to update and release once the term is over.

    - Reading.  I’ve only really read two books – not really doing well there.

  • Professional Development:- VBasic – no progress there really for doing DNN work
    - GIMP – yeah I’m much better at graphics work!
    - Flash – No… no progress there.
    - JQuery – Yeah I’ve gotten more comfortable with it but I’m no maestro.
    - Air – no progress

Looking Ahead

Now to take this time to revise a bit.  Where do I want to go with the remaining time, looking to the future?

I would like to get my house prepared for winter.  Finish the garage door opener. Finish weatherizing.

I would like to guide Owen with Mach5 a bit more positively. I’m sure he would like that too.  Mach5 Subscriber would be a good testbed for more JQuery practice.  And I may get some consulting work, too.

I would like to be more intentional with my Tai Chi practice.  And even more intentional with piano and reading and writing.

I would like to get a textbook going for Alice and Java, and work on the online resources for that.  If I had to choose between that project, and working on my really cool customer support tool, I’d choose the text. It’s more related to my teaching goals.

I’d also like to support my children in their creative work and get their website and blogs up and going so they can publish their artwork and write.  They’re doing well, but to set an intention with them, it would be to continue supporting them with their homework and enacouraging them in their growth.  I love being a father and it is sort of like setting an intention to breathe – it’s going to happen whether I intend it or not. And THAT is nice!  But to be intentional, since it is such a priority, I will list it.  That way I can reflect on it explicitly.

I want to be more intentional with Melly.  She’s important to me – my online companion – I am going to make sure that our time together is functional and purposeful even though she’s not the best at that whole purpose thing.

I need to get out more – more dances. More Tai Chi Group.  More time out of the house.

So I have:

  • Simplify with Mach5 and Subscriber.
  • Tai Chi – Practice and Group
  • Dancing – Once every other week at least.
  • Piano
  • Reading
  • Writing. Mostly writing here.
  • Be a good daddy!
  • Be a good friend and partner.
  • Professional Development:
    - VBasic – no progress there really for doing DNN work
    - JQuery – Continue to practice a bit, use Subscriber as practice bed

So there it is…. progress through October.  October is the time when things start pulling back within. Samhain.  When my spirit self begins to stir, restless desperation at life’s relentless progress in spite of things still left undone.

My companion and I will grasp hands and face the coming winter together.  I want to live by intention.  Intention to love, to feel, to breathe.   Not in just physical but also metaphysical sense.  To feel my connectedness to the one through which all connections thrive.  To breathe in and out the energy that surrounds us and moves through me to empower me to do the first. To love.  To love the One from whom and for whom and by whom and in whom all things ebb and flow.  To love that which flows.  Me.  You.  Together.

And now it occurs to me that this… now.. is the astronomical Samhain.  Today.  I do not think it’s a coincidence that this post comes now.  Though I’ve only now noticed it, the co-occurence is not a coincidence.  October 21 is the truer cross-corner day when we adjust for our calendar shift, just as December 21 is the actual equinix.

Blessings of Samhain to you, my dear friends… and…

As it harm none, and do good to least one, do as you will.

Superfluous Adornment

October 16th, 2009

I was reading in the news today about Obama’s hosting of visiting faithful and their celebration of Diwali.  I’d not heard of Diwali before, so decided to check it out.  It’s fascinating! Though the Wikipedia claims that the holiday is a celebration of personal triumph in good over evil, I’m skeptical that these concepts map well into English. Light over darkness may be a more apt view maybe? I don’t really know!

But then I got to reading about Mahavira, and his history.  This guy’s pretty cool.  Born into opulent princehood, he, like so many great Indian sages, gave up everything material for an ascetic life to free himself from the karmic bonds of suffering.

The guy literally went naked.  Everywhere.  In harsh weather, too.  He gave up everything!  His principles, or vows, which seem to align with the basic tenets of Jainism, are:

  • Try not to ever hurt any living creature
  • Speak truthfully, and only harmless truth at that
  • Don’t take stuff for yourself not properly given
  • Give up sensuality and most certainly sex… I wonder how he applies to enjoying the gift of chocolate mouse?
  • Detach from people, places, and things

What strikes me as odd is that, reviewing the iconography surrounding him, is the incongruity between these vows and the images of him. Though he’s sometimes naked in the middle of the icon and poised with legs crossed in a pose of sublime bliss, around him, and occasionaly on him, are opulent wealth.

As if he is made into a king almost – the king he was born to be.

Or a deity.

It seems a long way from the lifestyle he walked away from.  All the attachment to ritual, to dogma, to stuff.  Even if it is an ideal spiritual portrayal, or spiritual riches if you will, I don’t understand why anyone would connect images of opulent worldly wealth with this guy.

It is yet another example of our broken tendency to make things into that which they are not, to suit our own purposes or fit the paradigm of our own lives and power structures.  The Church did it with Jesus.  I am not sure the degree to which Islam did it with Muhammad but the radical differences between Suni and Shiite suggest that something is off base from its original intention.

This is yet another example of the facade of self-righteousness pinned on  “The Holy”.  In the end, our views, which we may like to claim are based on something divine and external, are our own.  And these holy works, beautiful as they are, do nothing to mask the fact that our convictions are still ours to own and to live by.

Book Review – The Giver

October 6th, 2009

My 7th grade daughter had to read The Giver for her Language Arts class.    Now back when I was in the 7th grade we had English class, not Language Arts, but I actually prefer the latter. Or maybe English Arts. But that’s irrelevant to what I was going tosay!  Sorry… I’m soooo easily distracted…

The Giver is set in a futuristic utopia in which citizens trade autonomy for peace.The setting unfolds as  the good guy, a coming-of-age boy named Jonas, faces the assignment of his lifelong career at the ripe old age of twelve!  Written in a narrative style from his point of view, he explores the limitations and advantages of his societal structure, anticipating along with his peers, the coming life changes.  He worries about his future.  His friendships. His family.

It’s not far into the book that you can figure out that when misfits of society are “released” that they are in fact put down like a rabid or sick dog, basically, as opposed to “lost” which comes from some accidental death or illness.  That’s no surprise.

Nor is it a surprise that Jonas is chosen for a pivotal influential role in this cute little world, nor the fact that his struggling with this role is going to lead to some pretty dramatic changes for everyone!

But the ending loses it.  It’s weak, poorly developed, and lacks any sort of dynamic twist.  (Spoiler…)

Read the rest of this entry »

The Art of Storytelling

October 2nd, 2009

My youngest goes off to “Weenitville” a great deal.  It’s that special place in her own imagination where her own world unfolds.  We named it after her when she was very young and she’s adopted it as her own special place, to reference her own imagination.  A safe place to go within one’s self.

She’s a movie producer there – she often works out entire screenplays and “watches movies” in her imagination. Or so she says.

She’s a story teller there – she will weave the strangest plots in her own little world.

Wild stories rich in imagery and character development unfold in Weenitville!

Rachel told me one of these stories just the other day.  She had been telling stories in 6-year-old mode? You know the kind of story?  And then everything kind of goes up?  And then it has a bit of inflection?  At the end?  But that’s really annoying to listen to.  So I told her to tell her stories using her voice as a tool to shape the story. Like music.  She had to work at it… and then she started from scratch.

The boy on his way to bed went into his closet to put his clothes in the hamper.  Much to his surprise, when he opened the hamper, out came a genie! The genie asked the boy what the boy wanted and offered to grant him three wishes, but not all of them right away. They had to be a month apart.  The boy, who was not a good student, asked the genie if the dog would do the boy’s homework whenever he asked and POOF! So it happened.

The boy asked the dog to finish his homework and he did!  Only his grades got worse, because the dog was not doing the homework all that well.  Also the boy was not learning anything and got further behind in his classes.

The next month the boy again found the genie in his closet and the genie asked him what he wanted.  The boy asked the genie if the dog could do his homework well. Because there’s no point having a dog do your homework if it isn’t done well! And POOF! So it happened.

For the next month the boy’s grades skyrocketed!  Everytime he asked the dog to do the homework the dog did it all! Happily, and perfectly!  But the problem was still that the boy was not learning anything. He failed his test.  His parents didn’t understand how he could be doing his work so well and not have a clue how to even do his math at all when they asked him questions, too.  And so they were about to send him off to some weird special school.

The next month the boy again found the genie in his closet and the genie asked him what he wanted.  The boy asked the genie, this time, if he could just undo the spells, because he really wanted to just be normal again. He wanted to learn his schoolwork. Maybe he wouldn’t get the best grades but that’s okay. He was going to do his best.

POOF!  And so it happened.  The end!

This kind of story makes a daddy cry. ;)

Operating System Essential Anti-Virus

September 29th, 2009

It’s always amazed me that the anti-virus software market’s been so big.  When you install anti-virus software, modifications are made to the very lowest level parts of the operating system to monitor internet traffic, email applications, scan devices when they are attached, and scan files when they are opened, in addition to monitoring system processes….. all of this sounds like techno-babble for stuff happening under the hood of your computer.

Under the hood of your computer you say?  Isn’t that where an operating system is supposed to exist for the most part?

An operating system should protect itself from viruses.  You shouldn’t need to have to install software on a computer system to guard against unapproved subversion of its operating system.  There are two ways to make this happen:

By Design

The operating system should be designed with application structure and process structure that makes security compromise difficult. I’ve always come down on hard on Microsoft for building too much power into things inappropriately.  Like ActiveX – do you really want some website able to run software on your computer and make changes to your hard drive?  Microsoft’s learned the hard way that exposing  application power and flexibility is unwise.

Not to say that Linux and variants are immune – they’re not.  But in general, applications that you install on these machines never make any changes to system files, and if they do, you have to give them permission.

Active Analysis

Enter: Anti-virus software.  People on Linux and Macs still don’t mess with it much – they just keep their operating systems up to date.  Even so, some degree of active protection should also be built into the operating system itself.  Maybe the OS could provide hooks for third parties to better analyze data as it’s read, too, but at a very basic level, some sort of semi-competent approach to active data scanning should happen right there at the application level as a feature of the OS itself.

I mean: Come on.  Look at all the cool stuff that your computer comes with out of the box that’s part of the operating system:  Media players and web browsers and image viewers and very basic editor capability, etc.

Kudos to Microsoft for adding Microsoft Security Essentials - the first OS-provided anti-virus solution, to their suite.

Unspoken Correlations Can Point to Intent

September 25th, 2009

It’s always astounded me, when I read of other nation’s dealings with Iran and its nuclear program, that all of the news articles fail to mention  a very key and critical fact.

But first, some questions:  Does a nation have a right to pursue an energy policy that puts other nations at risk by adding the specter of nuclear proliferation?  Iran seems to be claiming yes.  It’s national sovreignty!  Does a nation have a right to defend itself in like manner against its foes?  Iran has answered no.  It has no intention to build nuclear arms even though Israel does apparently have that capability.

Yet Israel’s own nuclear armaments, which still are not publicly acknowledged, are widely known to exist.  It would behoove world leaders to get rid of Israel’s nuclear threat if they want to put rival nations and faiths at ease, particularly given Israel’s own tendencies to act as a maverick rogue, stomping over other people’s rights and kicking people out of their homes, all backed, largely, by the Divine and Magnanimous Will and Word of Almighty US.

So Iran claims to want to build nuclear reactors for energy.  That’s laughable.

Iran, not blessed with oil reserves of many other middle east nations, happens to be sitting on one of the largest and most accessible natural gas reserves in the world.  There’s enough gas beneath the asses of those Iranian leaders to light their energy fires for centuries.  So it’s hard to respect the country’s whining about the needs to build nuclear reactors for power.

Yet why haven’t any news articles ever highlighted the fact that Iran doesn’t actually need nuclear power to be energy self-sufficient? It seems to be a key fact that points to Iran’s true intentions.

Sick on Arrival

September 23rd, 2009

Dead is such a harsh term.  And I’ve never quite heard of sick on arrival for a computer but….  I got a new Mac Book Pro!  I love that new mac smell.  Now I’ve been a Windows, Linux, and Mac user for 15 years – My first Mac was an LC-III.  Cute little amazing machine. I loved that thing!  After that I had a PowerPC 6100 with DOS card! That was sweet, too, and pretty fast.  It was actually two computers in one:  An Intel 486-DX and a PowerPC first generation.  Must have been running at 100Mhz or so too.  After that one though I went Powerbook style and have been mobile ever since, sometimes getting used ones.

For a brief two years, powerbooks were on price-per-feature par with Windows laptops even though the hardware quality of Apple laptops for the most part has been primo.  But the price comparison didn’t last long.  Even so, Macs keep a degree of resale value.  Even now, after three and a half years, my Macbook Pro 2 GHz model has a resale value of about $1000 or so not counting the fact that it has a larger hard drive in it.  But it has a bad motherboard, and flakes out a good bit. It’s the memory controller, you see.   It works as well as my own in that regard.  While I can’t replace my personal memory controller, I can replace the MacBook’s one for about $400.  That leaves me with a $600 margin still.

If you buy a new laptop every three years, and resell the old one, if you go Mac, you can get a top of the line MacBook Pro for $1000 every three years.  That’s not bad!  If you consider that Windows laptops just don’t keep that kind of resale value, the premium for a MacBook makes sense, if you like the OS.  Which I do!

So my new one came today!  A brand new 2.6 GHz 4 Gig ram thing with a swank graphics card in it.  Two grand.  My mom was here and I let her witness the whole new mac experience.  It’s very sensual.  The cardboard box feels quality. Everything about it says sexy.  Then.. “Watch THIS mom!”  I hit the on button.

The thing sits there with a white screen for 5 minutes, and then spits out a long blab of white text on a black background.  Kernel dump.  Ugh.

Oddly enough it did actually finish booting eventually and managed to restore everything from my backup!  I was amazed!  But the networking wouldn’t work, and on bootup and shutdown it always did that same kernel dump.

So… half an hour later on the phone and Apple’s sending me a replacement.  I have to wait another WEEK!  But I’m so PUMPED!  Why?

Because for the price of one mac I get to experience that new mac sensation TWICE!  YAY!