Posts Tagged ‘humanity’

Sunday, January 17th, 2010

Multicultural Quiz – Response

http://www.edchange.org/multicultural/quiz/quiz1.htm

My first feelings were frustration at being asked to differentiate between statistics as absolute numbers and not as relative values. But then I began to focus on the questions, rather than the answers, realizing that the answers were not so much the point.

Rather, the point is that the perception of the condition of our nation very much differs from the reality, and that our culture maintains and even furthers a wide disparity between class, race, wealth,and orientation.

It makes me sick, frankly.  I am recalling a conversation with a friend who works with lawyers and is helping a judge run for election, and we were discussing why it is that so few judges are ever contested in their elections.  The fact is that most lawyers don’t want to give up their high salaries to serve as judges, because they would trade wealth for power.

I am deeply saddened by the statistics that this quiz uncovers.  And I believe it’s time to become more assertive, more of an advocate for the disenfranchised and underserved, and more vocal about speaking out against the horrible bias in wealth distribution as well as the inequities in law enforcement that are indicative of a sick, perverted culture that advocates luxuriant wealth and self-interest over the well-being of the “huddled masses” that our statue of Liberty requests come to this place.

Google Tramples in Another Field

Wednesday, October 28th, 2009

The ever growing Googlemonster’s feet have started stomping in new places.  First it was web analytics – offering the free Google Analytics service.  Google purchased one of the online leaders in that field, Urchin, to make that happen.  Then it was YouTube.  Then Google Pages – free web page hosting.  And Google Docs. And Google Voice.  And now Google is making the Wave.  There are 20 or 30 other industries Google’s getting into, also.

Most people will be glad to have turn-by-turn directions on their GPS cellphones for free.  I know I will use it when I get a smartphone.  But I get a sinking feeling in my stomach when I think about it.

Recently a New York Times article published a bit about the new service:

But during a briefing with reporters on Tuesday, Eric E. Schmidt, Google’s chief executive, said he didn’t think of the new service as disrupting an industry. Instead, he said it is a windfall for consumers that was made possible by the increasing power of smartphones and the growing ubiquity of Internet access.

“Obviously we like the price of free because consumers like that as well,” he said.

After the briefing, Mr. Schmidt said he was not concerned that the new service would create new enemies for Google. “As long as you are on the side of consumers, you’ll be fine,” he said.

On the side of consumers.

That sounds so nice!  Who pays for all this stuff?  Consumers don’t?   Right.  At least not directly, and here’s the rub.

The people that consume the services are not the same people that directly pay for it.  That’s a problem!

Google makes the vast bulk of its googley profits by this little product called Google Adwords.  Advertising built into their online search – that right-hanging list of sponsored links.  The problem is that businesses who want to get a start online have no choice but to participate in that.  It’s the defacto standard.

Clicking once on any of those right links can add 50 cents, to upwards of several dollars to Google’s coffer.

And how are those ads placed? What determines which ads appear highest?  Well, Google optimizes the placement by which ones generate them the most money.  Clicks times Click-cost divided by impressions.  It’s a simple formula.

What it means for a small business owner, though, is sheer hell.  Or heaven.  But in the end, a business can expect to give away 40 to 60% of its gross revenue….

Google can eat more than half of a company’s gross revenue….

Not to making good products. Not to employees. Not to good materials! Not to production capacity…. but to Google.

Why?  Well if you and I are competing to sell mattresses, then if we want to get our site out there to people searching for mattresses, we compete against each other to see whose ad wins with optimal placement in Google Adsense.  We fight against each other to see which of us will give more profit to Google.  And the thing is, if I spend less than you do, I may get bumped off that precious first page entirely, and my sales will plummet.  Cause for an online business, particularly a new one, almost all the sales come from Google referrals.

So Google ends up with the win here. Not me, not you.  Except we get free GPS navigation on our phones! woohoo!

Google’s problem is this:

The customer that consumes their web search (the person who does google searches) is totally disconnected from the cost of placing the ad.  And the ad pricing model is built to extract the most money possible out of the business.

There’s a disconnect between the consumers of the service (the search customers), and the price of the service (as offered by the company posting the ad), and Google gets the difference.

If customers would wisen up, and just stop clicking on those ads, then Google’s money supply would go dry.  In the end, it’s the consumers that lose.  Google is cheating you by offering you all of this free stuff, and at the same time, taking the money out of your back pocket in the form of added cost of doing business that you pay to the people you buy stuff from.

Superfluous Adornment

Friday, October 16th, 2009

I was reading in the news today about Obama’s hosting of visiting faithful and their celebration of Diwali.  I’d not heard of Diwali before, so decided to check it out.  It’s fascinating! Though the Wikipedia claims that the holiday is a celebration of personal triumph in good over evil, I’m skeptical that these concepts map well into English. Light over darkness may be a more apt view maybe? I don’t really know!

But then I got to reading about Mahavira, and his history.  This guy’s pretty cool.  Born into opulent princehood, he, like so many great Indian sages, gave up everything material for an ascetic life to free himself from the karmic bonds of suffering.

The guy literally went naked.  Everywhere.  In harsh weather, too.  He gave up everything!  His principles, or vows, which seem to align with the basic tenets of Jainism, are:

  • Try not to ever hurt any living creature
  • Speak truthfully, and only harmless truth at that
  • Don’t take stuff for yourself not properly given
  • Give up sensuality and most certainly sex… I wonder how he applies to enjoying the gift of chocolate mouse?
  • Detach from people, places, and things

What strikes me as odd is that, reviewing the iconography surrounding him, is the incongruity between these vows and the images of him. Though he’s sometimes naked in the middle of the icon and poised with legs crossed in a pose of sublime bliss, around him, and occasionaly on him, are opulent wealth.

As if he is made into a king almost – the king he was born to be.

Or a deity.

It seems a long way from the lifestyle he walked away from.  All the attachment to ritual, to dogma, to stuff.  Even if it is an ideal spiritual portrayal, or spiritual riches if you will, I don’t understand why anyone would connect images of opulent worldly wealth with this guy.

It is yet another example of our broken tendency to make things into that which they are not, to suit our own purposes or fit the paradigm of our own lives and power structures.  The Church did it with Jesus.  I am not sure the degree to which Islam did it with Muhammad but the radical differences between Suni and Shiite suggest that something is off base from its original intention.

This is yet another example of the facade of self-righteousness pinned on  “The Holy”.  In the end, our views, which we may like to claim are based on something divine and external, are our own.  And these holy works, beautiful as they are, do nothing to mask the fact that our convictions are still ours to own and to live by.